USA TODAY has an op-ed that's worth reading. I've been waiting to see if anyone would present a counter-argument to the asinine idea that after Cheezy loses the election, he'll have the Supreme Court reverse the result in his favor by nullifying mail-in ballots --- or some other ridiculous horse shit along those lines.
Today's question: Does Cheezy corrupt everyone he associates with, or does he simply refuse to associate with anyone who isn't already corrupt?
Right now, it seems like every good Republican is working to get Biden elected, either as an individual or as a member of an anti-Cheezy committee like Lincoln Project. There are no good (R)s in Congress, and haven't been for a long time. This is one of several reasons Cheezy wants to make sure the only topic people are discussing is how he'll nullify the election and remain in power indefinitely.
Predictably, Cheezy plans to spend the first presidential debate personally attacking Biden. This should go over really well with the ignorant assholes who are already sure to vote for him, and should piss Biden voters off even more than they already are. Undecided voters? My personal theory is that the very few voters who haven't formed a strong opinion yet probably won't be watching the debate, and those who are interested enough to tune in probably want to hear Cheezy answer the moderator's questions instead of one of his pep rally monologues. Just a hunch.
No comments:
Post a Comment